Investment cost control draws praise

CEM Benchmarking report also cites added value of in-house team

By Michael Pramik, Ohio Public Employees Retirement System

Dec. 4, 2019 – OPERS’ investment staff provides added value to its portfolios by managing much of its own investments and has significantly cut investment fees, said CEM Benchmarking, a third-party consultant that tracks the pension industry.

CEM, which provides independent information for asset owners that include pension funds, endowments and foundations, pointed out that OPERS’ active investing strategies have provided $2.5 billion in added value over the past five years. Adjusting for fund size and asset mix, OPERS’ total investment cost was $59 million less than the CEM peer median cost.

CEM presented its results for the 2018 fiscal year survey at the November Board of Trustees meeting.

CEM’s investment benchmarking survey included an examination of total policy return and asset allocation differences, the net value-added provided by OPERS staff, total investment costs vs. the relative benchmark, and total investment portfolio risk.

The report compared OPERS’ cost and return performance to 323 funds in the CEM database and compared those metrics to a peer group of 15 pension funds with a median size of $97.8 billion, about the size of OPERS.

Net return was broken down into two portions: policy return, which is the return we would have earned if we had invested in “passive” index funds, and the value added by OPERS staff decisions.

OPERS’ total five-year net return of 5.4 percent equaled the U.S. public pension fund median return during that period. More importantly, OPERS provided 0.4 percent of added value (beyond the peer median active return of -0.1 percent) by actively managing a portion of the portfolio, which translates to $2.5 billion above market returns for that period.

OPERS also checked in favorably as a low-cost investment provider, as noted above. CEM said our costs have gone down because we’re paying lower management and performance fees for hedge funds, real estate and private equity. For instance, we paid nearly $17 million less in 2018 in hedge fund fees than did our peers.

We’ve also increased our use of passive index funds and internal management – from 35 percent of assets in 2014 to 42 percent in 2018 – actions that have contributed to the lower cost structure.

CEM said OPERS’ asset risk score of 10.4 percent compared favorably to our peer group’s median of 10.5 percent. Asset risk is defined as the standard deviation of the policy return.

Michael Pramik

Michael Pramik is communication strategist for the Ohio Public Employees Retirement System and editor of the PERSpective blog. As an experienced business journalist, he clarifies complex pension policies and helps members make smart choices to secure their retirement.

Michael Pramik

Communication Strategist

7 thoughts on “Investment cost control draws praise

  • December 4, 2019 at 11:17 am
    Permalink

    I read in our local paper the financial costs of our banking to be $7.5 mil… that is our monies. as we the workers are funding these accounts for our future I feel that $7.5 mil needs to re-investigated. it seems someone is benefiting greatly by raising this cost, per our paper, x 3 over the past 3 yrs. if my banking fees were to triple in 3 yrs I would have been seeking out a new bank for lower fees! something has to be done here ! budget cuts have been done yet someone felt the need to triple our fees! is that right? NO!

    Reply
    • December 13, 2019 at 11:53 am
      Permalink

      We appreciate and share your concerns; however, our custodial bank is chosen by the Ohio Treasurer.

      Reply
  • December 4, 2019 at 11:19 am
    Permalink

    Thank you for all the hard work and continued dedication that truly benefits us all.

    Reply
  • December 4, 2019 at 11:27 am
    Permalink

    Thank you for keeping our pensions going…very grateful! 👍

    Reply
  • January 30, 2020 at 7:21 am
    Permalink

    Does the investment staff receive regular bonuses in addition to their salary? If so, who receives the bonuses and for how much? How often?

    Reply
    • January 31, 2020 at 5:13 pm
      Permalink

      Stacy,

      OPERS employees are placed within a pay range based on their education, experience, knowledge, skills and abilities. Pay ranges are set based on competitive market data for similar positions for employers in the central Ohio area.

      In the case of our Investment Division staff, we look at both public and private money managers in the region. Investment professionals are eligible for additional incentive compensation based primarily on their performance versus market performance. Incentives vary from year to year and are not guaranteed. This is standard in the investment industry. The salaries posted on the Treasurer’s website include incentive pay.

      Julie, OPERS

      Reply

Leave a Reply

dialog-information.png
We encourage your comments on the Ohio Public Employees Retirement System’s PERSpective blog. We can’t respond to every comment. Please be aware that we review all comments before they’re posted, and we reserve the right to edit, not publish or remove any comment that in our sole discretion does not further the purpose of the blog. For further details, please see our Comments Policy.
 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *